By combining Davidson's analysis of the logical form of action sentences with some of the ideas from GB theory, James Higginbotham has proposed the first serious alternative to Jon Barwise's situation semantics treatment of naked-infinitive perceptual reports. The present paper argues that Higginbotham's theory makes no desirable empirical predictions over and above those made by Barwise's original proposal, and that it does not succeed in simultaneously fulfilling its syntactic and semantic obligations.